Monday, October 1, 2012
Discussion of “Feds Link Water Contamination to Fracking for the First Time”
The article titled “Feds Link Water Contamination
to Fracking for the First Time” by Abraham Lustgarten and Nicholas Kusnetz was
very informative. Before this piece, I had no idea what fracking was, or the
dangers associated with it. The fact that EnCana is denying that fracking is
the cause of pollution in the wells the EPA has tested is not surprising, and
not totally unjustified. The EPA has found one chemical associated with
fracking in wells in Pavillion, but they only found it once. Sure, the company
could be being very careful, but the fact that even one source of drinking
water was contaminated is unacceptable. Although, since it was only found once
it could have not even been EnCana’s fault, which is basically what they are
claiming. If this is the case though, then why would they not give a full list of
the chemicals used to the EPA so they could be sure? I personally believe that
fracking is not only the cause of the pollution, but I think that EnCana knows
it, and that’s why they’re being so reluctant to give over the information that
the EPA has been requesting. If EnCana was really innocent then they would just
tell the EPA what they use and have their name cleared, but they won’t so it’s
not too hard to believe that they know they’re polluting the water.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This article is about the controversy concerning fracking for natural gas. In Pavillion, scientists have linked different chemicals in their “test wells” to chemicals used in fracking. The discovery is urging environmentalists are to create more strict laws for fracking. McKibben created 350.org and his main message is that people need to realize that the environment is negatively changing because if us.
ReplyDelete